You said the math was bad for trying to draw a correlation from those data points. I agree with your point. I wasn’t trying to draw a correlation from those data points, I was trying to show that media sources were being untruthful about the data when they drew correlations with those data points. Then I referenced a solid statistical study that did a multivariate analysis (as should be done) to comb the slight variation out of the numbers. Then you accused me of not wanting to talk to a statistician, even though I literally speak with the literal statistician who published not only that study, but some of the best studies in the field. I’m not sure what we’re even talking about at this point. Have a good day though, and thank you for the comments!